Last Chapter on Suki Falconberg (Hopefully)
In case you’re coming in mid-stream, you can get a better understanding of this post by reading the following two previous posts:
Enslaved Bar Girls in Pattaya??
My Response to Suki Falconberg
After the second post Suki emailed me directly with a multi-page response to what I had written. She said she was referencing some personal details about herself and thus did not want me to post the emails nor did she want to respond on the website. I respected that wish though she said very little in the email that I haven’t seen her post herself on other websites.
I responded back to her pointing out not only the multitude of things she was factually incorrect about but also flaming her for her victim attitude. I explained to her how claiming that every time she had sex as a prostitute was rape was an insult to every woman who has actually been physically forced to have sex against her will. She readily admits that she was not pimped nor was she a blow job in the alley type prostitute. She often dined with her customers first and always had the ability to walk away from any guy she didn’t want to have sex with.
To keep calling that rape in every single post she does about prostitution is only self-serving. Perhaps she thinks way down deep inside that she can justify a poor life decision by equating it with forced sex. Perhaps she feels that the need to make money was her coercion. Personally it sickens me that she insists on using such an emotionally charged word to describe her decision to have sex with men for money.
On that topic, one of the points she’s made in the past and she made yet again in her email was that prostitution is designed only to give the man benefits while the prostitute gets nothing. It’s a clever trick she plays because your first thought is to think about the fact that the guy is getting his kicks while most could care less if the prostitute finds the experience enjoyable. But then you remember, oh year, he’s paying her for this. If we use Suki’s victim-like thinking then my employer is the only one who benefits from my hard work. Everybody can be a victim if we discount the fact that we’re paid to perform our jobs. Suki’s job was to have sex with men. I’m sorry she found it unfulfilling physically and emotionally but she was paid a fair wage for her services. If she’s unhappy with her career choice then she can change jobs. But to claim that she received nothing out of her hooking experience is disingenuous much like everything else that comes out of her mouth.
After my email response to her she sent me another multi-page email which I chose not to respond to. I decided not to respond to her emails any more because it’s quite obvious she has no desire to be educated. Her emails ask leading questions and when you correct her she simply re-phrases the same misinformation. How can you continue to have an intellectually honest conversation with someone who’s logic works like this?
Yes, we are victims. Most definitely we are victims. I am not ashamed of being a victim. I am many other things–a writer, a professional, a good friend to those who need me, a compassionate person. But I am also a victim–and I am not ashamed of this. I am not ashamed either to acknowledge that prostitution is rape of the female body. I will admit the rape is far, far worse with the imprisoned brothel girl than with the girl who has some ‘choice,’ but it is still rape.
And then in the same emails says:
I need to add that I don’t think there is anything wrong with prostitution if it benefits the girl and she is not hurt by it. But many prostitutes also report a lot of physical violence by customers. And a lot of psychological damage. If we can change prostitution so that it is kind to the girl, and good for her, I would be all for it. But attitudes that she is ‘dirt’ are never going to help change this for her–and her ‘kind.’
All prostitutes are victims and prostitution is rape of the female body but she’s okay with it if it benefits the girl and she is not hurt by it?!??!?! What’s even better is that she admits that she was more of the escort type of hooker and not someone who was forced to have sex so by definition she was engaging in the type of prostitution that she says is okay but then she claims that every time she had sex with a customer she was raped.
This Suki gal is really fucked in the head. She’s a pathological liar and as manipulative as a Patpong lifer. My best read on her is that her crusade is to convince the world that she is a victim. Her decision to sell her body for money was not her fault. She seems to want to remove any accountability for her poor career choice by making it seems as if she had no choice. She latches onto sensationalistic accounts of severe mistreatment of women and then hopes some of the pity for them will brush off onto her if she can associate herself with them closely enough by making sure everyone knows she’s an ex-prostitute. In fact, that’s is her only expertise on the subject matter. Everything else she knows comes from watching documentary films (which is how she came up with all of her accusations about the enslaved Pattaya girls).
What a waste.
Stumble it!